<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.iis.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:cs="http://blogs.iis.net/"><channel><title>The world of Syndication: Atom 1.0 vs. RSS 2.0?</title><link>http://blogs.iis.net/vsood/archive/2008/10/06/the-world-of-syndication-atom-1-0-vs-rss-2-0.aspx</link><description>Syndication has become and inseparable part of the internet. There are two major syndication formats that exist today – RSS 2.0 (Really Simple Syndication) and Atom 1.0 (Atom Syndication Format). While they achieve the same end result, there are differences</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: The world of Syndication: Atom 1.0 vs. RSS 2.0?</title><link>http://blogs.iis.net/vsood/archive/2008/10/06/the-world-of-syndication-atom-1-0-vs-rss-2-0.aspx#3114690</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:29:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">50bcf3b4-f6fe-4638-adff-0c150e922e99:3114690</guid><dc:creator>davidblair</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This article was very useful and made understanding the differences easy. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One short note, while reading it I noticed that you wrote, &amp;quot;RSS 2.0 is a frozen specification copyrighted by Harvard&amp;quot; which I do not think is an accurate description. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The specification is licensed under Creative Commons 1.0 BY-SA by Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School. The full description of the license and attribution requirements can be found at: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html#licenseAndAuthorship"&gt;cyber.law.harvard.edu/.../rss.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It has been 200 days since you wrote this article, so things may have changed since initial publication. I think it is worth updating the article to reflect this change since the current state of the RSS 2.0 specification is now much more open.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.iis.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3114690" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The world of Syndication: Atom 1.0 vs. RSS 2.0?</title><link>http://blogs.iis.net/vsood/archive/2008/10/06/the-world-of-syndication-atom-1-0-vs-rss-2-0.aspx#2906604</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:55:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">50bcf3b4-f6fe-4638-adff-0c150e922e99:2906604</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Chrome has no RSS?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.iis.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2906604" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The world of Syndication: Atom 1.0 vs. RSS 2.0?</title><link>http://blogs.iis.net/vsood/archive/2008/10/06/the-world-of-syndication-atom-1-0-vs-rss-2-0.aspx#2664750</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:42:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">50bcf3b4-f6fe-4638-adff-0c150e922e99:2664750</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the article. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;#39;s clear for me now that I will use Atom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.iis.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2664750" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Soci blog  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Atom vs. RSS, ki a jobb?</title><link>http://blogs.iis.net/vsood/archive/2008/10/06/the-world-of-syndication-atom-1-0-vs-rss-2-0.aspx#2664741</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:37:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">50bcf3b4-f6fe-4638-adff-0c150e922e99:2664741</guid><dc:creator>Soci blog  » Blog Archive   » Atom vs. RSS, ki a jobb?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Soci blog &amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;raquo; Atom vs. RSS, ki a jobb?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.iis.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2664741" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>