Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

sinema izle — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:50:49 GMT

URLscan nie jest martwy?

URLScan 3.0 RTW (non-beta) released

Aaron Tiensivu's Blog — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:33:42 GMT

Helps prevent SQL injection attacks to IIS sites, among other new features: 1. W3C formatted logging: UrlScan v3.0 RTW has W3C formatted logs so that analyzing log files is more accessible by writing queries against them using Log Parser. 2. Allow r

UrlScan v3.0 RTW Released

iis — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:06:05 GMT

About 2 months ago we released the beta for UrlScan v3.0 to address customer concerns with automated

URLscan nie jest martwy?

ziembor.pl — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:36:04 GMT

URLscan nie jest martwy?

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

Anonymous — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:27:19 GMT

To reduce number of SQL injection attempts, I would monitor my UrlScan logs for known bad sites and then use the IP restriction list to block those sites.

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

Anonymous — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:09:19 GMT

Will URLScan reduce the amount of bandwidth taken up by the SQL injection pelting?

Does it help to reduce the number of attempts? If not is there anything to reduce number of injection attempts?

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

naziml — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:57:29 GMT

No UrlScan will not monitor POST data. Check blogs.iis.net/.../urlscan-v3-0-filtering-based-on-request-entity.aspx

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:33:03 GMT

Will URL Scan 3.0 monitor post data when forms are submitted?

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

naziml — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:33:02 GMT

I definitely see the value in an 'AND' evaluation of a list. Let me think about it a little more. Thanks for the feedback.

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

Rovastar — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:24:45 GMT

For your reference Nazim here appears to be a legitimate use of the > characters.

forums.iis.net/.../1150115.aspx

I am wondering if you could change the tool so that you only reject a request if you have both < and >

I am trying to look from an admin point of view and what is useful in the real world. It cannot reject legit request while at the same time increase security.

re: Using the new rules configuration in UrlScan v3.0 Beta (Part 1)

Anonymous — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:10:31 GMT

THANK YOU>